Assessment Criteria:
- Good: > 95%
- Acceptable: 91% – 94%
- Needs Improvement: < 90%
Service Quality Monitoring
Number of on-time departures
Total number of scheduled departures
Calculated Ratio: (On-time Departures / Total Departures) × 100
1.955
2.014
2.108
2.076
92,74%
97,01%
Assessment Criteria:
Number of trips actually operated
Number of guaranteed scheduled trips
Calculated Ratio: (Operated / Scheduled) × 100
2.108
2.076
2.040
2.040
103,33%
101,76%
Assessment Criteria:
Number of complaints received regarding lack of courtesy during the month
1
2
Assessment Criteria:
Reports of Cleaning Deficiencies (Audit Source)
Reports of Cleaning Deficiencies (CRM Complaints Source)
Total Monthly Reports
-
-
1
-
1
-
Assessment Criteria:
Number of survey questions with an average score below 3.5 (on a scale of 1–5)
0
1
Assessment Criteria:
Number of refund requests submitted
Number of refunds processed
Number of refunds pending
% of refunds pending
347
442
347
441
-
1
0,00%
0,23%
Assessment Criteria:
Number of Complaints / Assistance Requests Received
Number of Complaints / Assistance Requests Closed
Number of Complaints / Assistance Requests Pending
% of Complaints / Assistance Requests Pending
797
1.052
789
1.046
8
6
1,00%
0,57%
Assessment Criteria:
Number of participants: 1,400 / Average score: 3.8 / 5
Strong points
Identified Strengths: Vessel punctuality
4,3
Identified Strengths: Courtesy and performance of ticket office personnel
4
Weak points
Areas for Improvement: Ticket office facilities
3,4
Areas for Improvement: Waiting time at the terminal prior to boarding
3,5